Cult Abuse of Chlldren

What might have happened if the mothers and children of the Branch Davidians had been captured instead of slaughtered that day in April, 1995?  Would it have been that different than what is happening today? A cult that uses women and children as their sex slaves in the name of religion is one that cannot be allowed to continue. 

What they are brought up to believe

Yet the children, male and female alike, in this bizarre sect have all been brought up to believe in their  “faith” s as a natural, precious, and fundamental part of what it is to be a human being.   They go about their lives believing, as they have for generations, that this is truth and the way to God’s Kingdom.  Each and every one of them is raised to accept this view of themselves and others.  They each believe in what they were conditioned to believe since birth.  Their accepted worldview rejects or technology, and our modern ways and the knowledge of psychology and the acquired wisdoms of the past 150 years.  Ignorance was their choice.  It is always the way of cults in general. Outside knowledge of other’s beliefs is not only discouraged but punished.  No new knowledge can be allowed into the closed system because new knowledge would destroy the system.

Who is going to be prosecuted?

Do you prosecute the women who were brought up to believe that marrying off your children to much older men is acceptable? Do you prosecute these same women for abandoning their young sons that were thrown out of their “families” because there were too many of them? Do your prosecute the men, who were brought up to believe it is their rightful place to have many young wives and force them to have sex with them as they please?

Clearly Criminal

Clearly all of the above constitute legal abuse and crimes that are normally punishable by law. Yet what happens when we begin to view this case as a case of programming, not unlike that of Patty Hearst?  All of the members of this sect were programmed from birth to see their lifestyle as the only choice acceptable by God as they understand him.

Is it our role as a legal community to imprison them for their crimes, as we did Patty Hearst, or is our responsibility to them something entirely different? What if we could view them not as perpetrators of horrors upon innocent victims, but as victims themselves worthy of our compassion? 

The Travesty

Some people already are seeing the travesty that is likely to occur to these people and have been protesting outside the courtrooms where we attempt to find “justice” for those our courts are attempting to protect.  Unfortunately there are no “bad guys” here to prosecute.  The system was the problem, not the people involved.  All of these people were caught up in a system that was dangerous and just plain wrong.  But there are no bad guys are there?

A different perspective

It changes everything when you try to look a situation from the prospective of compassion rather than the old egocentric view of seeing everyone as a good guy, a bad guy or a victim.  When we impose our legal system on these people by prosecuting them for doing what they earnestly believed was the righteous way of living, we become what our forefathers fought against.  We as a community become the perpetrators by prosecuting this group for their religious practices. 

Clearly abuse is abuse

But what they were doing to their children was wrong. There is no question about that is there? Raping children of the age of 12 or 14, abandoning children (boys) who were not going to be useful in continuing their patterns of multiple marriages to one male is all wrong.  Morally and ethically we cannot let it continue, but we have to stop it in a way that does not make anyone a criminal. 

Practicing Empathy

We have to put ourselves in their shoes and practice empathy for their situation.  There are those in our culture (among whom I count myself) who oppose the everyday practice of circumcision as genital mutilation of our baby boys.  It’s as wrong as the genital mutilation of girls that we have outlawed in this country, even when practiced for religious reasons.  Yet we continue to practice this primitive mutilation of baby boys on a daily basis all across our nation.  It’s okay to do it to boys, but not to girls.  I don’t get that at all. 

When we consider that the practice of genitally mutilating boys is a natural normal practice in our culture, it makes it hard not to step into the shoes of a cult that sees raping 12-14 year old girls as a natural and normal practice in theirs. 

It changes everything when we begin to have empathy for their beliefs and understand that, like us, they have been brought up in a culture which finds some very bizarre practices to be normal and natural. 

What do you think?

Is there a difference between taking innocent babies and mutilating their genitals and taking a 12-13 year old girl into a forced marriage and raping them? Can you find empathy for their strange beliefs or do you see them as a sick, perverted culture that needs to be punished? Tell me what you think. Comment below